Food and Climate.
A 150 g beef steak carries about 15 kg of greenhouse gases; the same weight of lentils, about 0.15. Transport is usually a small part of either.
Life-cycle assessments add up everything it takes to produce a food: land use change, fertiliser and manure, methane from cattle digestion and from rice paddies, feed, processing, packaging, transport and retail. The largest study, by Joseph Poore and Thomas Nemecek (2018), pooled data from about 38 000 farms in 119 countries. Its averages per kilogram of product range from about 100 kg of CO₂-equivalent for beef from beef herds and 40 for lamb, through 24 for cheese, 12 for pork and 10 for poultry, to about 1–4 for most plant foods and under 1 for potatoes and peas. Variation within a food is large — the worst beef farms emit many times the best — but the differences between foods are larger still.
Two other findings matter for cooks. Transport is usually a small share — often under a tenth of a food's footprint — except for food flown in by air; what you eat matters far more than where it comes from. And food that is lost or wasted carries all its emissions with it: food loss and waste account for roughly 8–10 % of global emissions (XXXI.10). So the kitchen's levers are the menu — more plant-forward dishes, smaller portions of the highest-emitting foods, using whole animals well — and waste. The workshop builds a plate.
Below: the greenhouse-gas emissions of a plate with the protein and portion you choose and a side of rice, potatoes or bread (mean emissions per kilogram from Poore and Nemecek 2018, as compiled by Our World in Data), against the same plate with each other protein.
- Read emissions per kilogram of food.
- Compare proteins by footprint.
- Weigh transport against food choice.
- Cut emissions through menu and waste.
The menu is the lever
A 150 g beef portion carries about 15 kg of CO₂-equivalent on these averages; chicken about 1.5; lentils about 0.15 — a factor of about 100 between beef and pulses per kilogram. The side dish matters little beside the protein. These are global averages, and a particular farm can do much better or worse; but no realistic improvement closes the gap between ruminant meat and plants.
In practice: make pulses, grains and vegetables the centre of more dishes (XXIX.5, XX.8), and use meat — especially beef and lamb — as a seasoning or a smaller portion rather than the whole plate; choose poultry, pork, eggs or sustainably farmed fish over ruminant meat more often; use whole animals and their by-products (XXXI.4); cut waste by planning and portioning (XXXI.10, XXIII.1); avoid air-freighted produce, which is the exception where transport counts. Present the change as delicious food, not as sacrifice: the world's great vegetarian cuisines (XXIX.10) show how.
Plan a week of dinners and estimate their emissions with the factors in the caption. Swap two beef meals for pulse dishes and compare.
Terms
- CO₂-equivalent
- Greenhouse gases expressed as the CO₂ with the same warming effect.
- Life-cycle assessment
- Counting emissions from farm to shop.
- Enteric methane
- Methane from ruminants' digestion.
- Plant-forward
- Dishes centred on plants, with meat as an accent.
Sources
- J. Poore and T. Nemecek, "Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers", Science 360 (2018) 987–992; mean greenhouse-gas emissions per kilogram of product as compiled by Our World in Data (kg CO2-equivalent): beef (beef herd) 99.5, lamb 39.7, cheese 23.9, farmed fish 13.6, pork 12.3, poultry 9.9, eggs 4.7, rice 4.5, tofu 3.2, milk 3.2, wheat 1.6, peas 1.0, potatoes 0.5, nuts 0.4.
- UNEP, Food Waste Index Report 2024: about 1.05 billion tonnes of food wasted in 2022 — about 60 % in households, 28 % in food service and 12 % in retail — beside the roughly 13 % lost between harvest and retail (FAO); food loss and waste together account for about 8–10 % of global greenhouse-gas emissions.